The single-item need to belong scale.
By Austin Lee Nichols, Gregory D. Webster. 2013
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d51bb9142202a02687bccc4e305df6dc2d061318
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Kelly-Ann Allen
- Isabel Fernandez-Mateo
- Margaret L. Kern
- Raina A. Brands
- D. McInerney
- Christopher S. Rozek
- George M. Slavich
- Ronnel B. King
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kelly-Ann Allen
- Isabel Fernandez-Mateo
- Margaret L. Kern
- Raina A. Brands
- D. McInerney
- Christopher S. Rozek
- George M. Slavich
Citations in the corpus
- Leaning Out: How Negative Recruitment Experiences Shape Women’s Decisions to Compete for Executive Roles (2017, result): “We also ruled out two other ‘‘belonging’’ concerns as explanations for our results by rerunning our analyses with two single-item measures of belonging as controls (Nichols and Webster, 2013): one for the need to belong generally and one for the sense of belonging in the fictional company.”
- Belonging: a review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research (2021, background): “Belonging has been defined and operationalised in several ways (e.g., Goodenow, 1993; Hagerty & Patusky, 1995; Malone et al., 2012; Nichols & Webster, 2013), which has enabled investigators to test whether interventions increase a sense of belonging over days, weeks, or months.”