The Structure of Licensing Contracts

By Bharat Anand, Tarun Khanna. 2003

605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39f9b0d09060b5f6acfabe70eaf704eba99264a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates (2005, background): “For example, the ‘relative incidence’ of licensing, in comparison to other channels for external knowledge acquisition, may be particularly high in the pharmaceutical industry ( Anand and Khanna, 2000 ).13 A majority of the top 20 firms have started their corporate venturing funds after 1993.”
Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of inter-firm partnership formation. (2006, background): “Ring and Van de Ven (1992), Dyer and Singh (1998), Gulati (1999), Kale and Singh (1999), and Anand and Khanna (2000) indicate”
The market for patents in Europe (2007, background): “Anand and Khanna (2000) show that in the chemical sector, and especially in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, where patent protection is more effective, there is a higher propensity to license than in other industries.”
How SMEs exploit their intellectual property assets: evidence from survey data (2011, neutral): “In an attempt to understand the various characteristics of licensing contracts, Anand and Khanna (2000) confirm the general perception that the majority of licensing contracts are found in the chemical, computer and electronics industries.”
Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing (2006, positive): “Anand and Khanna (2000) find that in the chemicals sector, where patents are believed to be effective, there are more technology deals—a large fraction of these are arm’s length and involve exclusive licenses, a large fraction concerns future technologies rather than existing technologies, and a sma”
Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances (2005, methodology): “Anand and Khanna (2000a) find that prior alliance experience is positively correlated with abnormal stock price returns on joint venture announcement, suggesting that firms learn to create more value as they accumulate experience with joint ventures.3 Further, Anand and Khanna (2000a) find that the ”
The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays (2008, background): “While the overall analysis of deal structure across different types of players is extremely informative (Lerner and Merges, 1998; Anand and Khanna, 2000; Arora et al., 2001; Dechenaux et al., 2003; Elfenbein, 2004), we focus our data sample in order to construct a clear test of our theoretical frame”
The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome (2014, background): “According to Anand and Khanna (2000), licensing-in accounts for 20–33% of strategic alliances in high tech sectors.”
Do Firms Learn from International Trade? (2006, background): “For more information on this data, see Anand and Khanna (2000).”
The costs of shared ownership: Evidence from international joint ventures (2004, background): “Building on this work, Oxley (1997) and Anand and Khanna (2000) also identify the hazard of intangible asset appropriability in arm’s-length relationships and various forms of alliances.”
The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics (2008, background): “Arora et al. (2003) also find a large disparity between large and small US firms.”
Experience, imitation, and the sequence of foreign entry: wholly owned and joint-venture manufacturing by South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995 (2003, positive): “Thus the staged model suggests that firms learn not only from repeated use of the same entry mode (e.g. Anand and Khanna, 2000b) but also across modes of entry.”
The Cost of Misaligned Governance in R&D Alliances (2004, neutral): “(1996), Oxley (1997, 1999), and Anand and Khanna (2000). 25.”
Licensing-in fosters rapid invention! the effect of the grant-back clause and technological unfamiliarity (2012, background): “Firms’ innovation strategies increasingly involve technology in-licensing, leading to firms becoming active in the markets for technology where licensing accounts for the lion’s share of technology exchanges and also plays a lead role in the diffusion of technology (Anand and Khanna, 2000; Arora and”
Organizational Choice in R&D Alliances: Knowledge Based and Transaction Cost Perspectives (2004, neutral): “17 Recent studies that have used the SDC data include Anand and Khanna (2000) and Sampson (1999).”