Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production

By B. Amable. 2000

429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d4018fe150777b12038497c8a167b942bcc7e11f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The political economy of comparative corporate governance (2003, background): “…economic resources through ‘perfect’ capital, labour and product markets will lead to optimal economic outcomes (Albert, 1991; Amable et al ., 1997; Amable, 2000; Aoki, 2001; Dore, 1973; Hall and Soskice, 2001; Herrigel, 1995; Lazonick, 1990, 1991; Lazonick and O’Sullivan, 1996; Dore et al .,…”
Path Dependence and Path Plasticity: The Co-evolution of Institutions and Innovation – the German Customized Business Software Industry (2010, neutral): “Amable (2000) points to the institutional hierarchy, the relative importance of one or a few institutions for the coherence and dynamic of the institutional architecture as such.”
Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy (2010, background): “Rather, they function in concert with other preexisting mechanisms (Amable, 2000; Boyer, 2005; Deeg, 2007).”
Does Biotech Reflect a New Science-based Innovation Regime? (2003, methodology): “This concept was first developed in a game-theoretical perspective by Aoki (1995, 2001), but it has been reused and somewhat redesigned in the ‘‘Varieties of Capitalism’’ literature (Hall and Soskice 2001), or in the French Regulation approach (Amable 2000).”
The Diversity Of Modern Capitalism (2003, methodology): “The European SSIP's heterogeneity, as already stated in Amable, Barré, and Boyer (1997), is noteworthy for its breakdown into three variants.”
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations (2007, background): “…research on institutional complementarities has tended to rely on case studies or smaller samples of countries (e.g., Albert, 1993; Hollingsworth & Boyer, 1997; Whitley, 1999), and the empirical testing of larger samples is only beginning to emerge (e.g., Amable, 2000; Hall & Gingerich, 2004).”
Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism (2015, methodology): “But complementarity can work both ways, reinforcing or weakening an existing institutional conﬁguration (Amable, 2000).”
The Technological Resilience of U.S. Cities (2014, background): “It is also important to understand how institutional structures within regions provide opportunities and set limits on the types of new growth paths that can be developed (Amable, 2000; Hall and Soskice, 2001; Strambach, 2010).”
Corporate Governance and Innovation: A Survey (2012, positive): “Such a definition can be applied to institutions as well (see, for example, Amable, 2000 – for a general discussion on the relation between complementarities among institutional arrangements and national systems of innovation – and Aoki, 2001).”
Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise (2008, neutral): “Pauly and Reich (1997) and Amable (2000). A partial exception is the work of Yeung (2002) which focuses on the impact of domestic institutions on entrepreneurship and the internationalisation of firms from Hong Kong and Singapore.”
Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience (2015, background): “This comes close to the notion of institutional complementarity (AMABLE, 2000; HOLLINGSWORTH, 2000; HALL and SOSKICE, 2001), which is about institutions that reinforce each other and make one another more efficient (see also GRILLITSCH, 2014). The Varieties of Capitalism literature is very relevant ”
How and why capitalisms differ (2005, background): “By merely combining these institutional forms, we already come up with 2 to the power of 5 (25 i.e., 32 different) variations, even if we 14 MPIfG Discussion Paper 05 /4 adopt the simplistic hypothesis that each can only assume two extreme configurations (Amable 1999; Amable et al. 2001).”
What Connects Industrial Relations and Corporate Governance? Explaining Institutional Complementarity (2005, background): “8 Amable et al. (2001) and Hall and Gingerich (2004) differ with respect to which side will defect in a”