How and why capitalisms differ
By R. Boyer. 2005
323 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8124b898cb616a7cd487daf106f96c8bce17262
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- Jamie Peck
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- A. Amin
- M. Matthijs
- Stav Fainshmidt
- Patrik Aspers
- Vanessa M. Strike
- William Q. Judge
In Political Science and International Relations
- Jamie Peck
- A. Amin
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- M. Matthijs
- Stav Fainshmidt
- Patrik Aspers
- Vanessa M. Strike
- William Q. Judge
Citations in the corpus
- Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies (2015, unknown): “…market economies’ (LMEs; as proposed for US and Great Britain) have recently been complemented by a third model of ‘dependent market economies’ (DMEs) (for economies in East Central Europe, see Nölke and Vliegenthart, 2009)5 and models of state-led market economies (Boyer, 2005; Schmidt, 2009).”
- Disorganized welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe (2006, background): “Germany was by no means an exception, though, irrespective of what usually is referred to as varieties of capitalism (Boyer, 2005; Ebbinghaus and Manow, 2001; Schmidt, 2002).”
- A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics? (2013, background): “Accordingly, each variety of capitalism is typically associated with an emblematic firm (Boyer, 2005; Carney et al., 2009), an organizational form that ‘fits’, or is best adapted to, the opportunities provided by its institutional environment.”
- The Organization of Markets (2015, background): “…fundamentally consist of spontaneous processes of mutual adjustment, but that states sometimes play a central role in interfering in these processes by setting new rules for the actions and interactions of market actors, as in the case of ‘market failures’ (Boyer, 1990, 2005; Streeck, 2005).”
- Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise (2009, background): “On this point, Boyer (2005) is critical of the H&S version of VoC, arguing that there are more than two viable forms of capitalism and that the VoC expectation of firm homogeneity, especially the emergence of a single emblematic firm, is a major deficiency with the theory as it fails to account for ”
- Geographies of circulation and exchange: constructions of markets (2009, background): “However, they join those critics (e.g. Boyer, 2005) who are uneasy about the reduction of a diverse literature to the Varieties of Capitalism (VoC) project advanced by Peter Hall and David Soskice (2001).”
- The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility (2011, methodology): “The Western European governance systems, which are embedded in the organized (or coordinated) model of capitalism, have tended to be characterized by more concentrated financial systems, more regulated education and labour systems, and cultural systems more sceptical about business and confident abo”
- Black Swans, Lame Ducks, and the mystery of IPE's missing macroeconomy (2017, background): “…respond with a limited repertoire of policy choices.26 In terms of what we find of value today, the original Regulation School literature made a distinction between the accumulation regime (how value is generated) and themode of regulation (how value is distributed and governed) (Boyer, 2005b).”
- Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016, background): “In general, while we agree with the statement that every national institutional system “will exhibit divergent and unique characteristics” (Carney et al., 2009: 7), studies do point to “a remarkable convergence upon just a few configurations” (Boyer, 2005: 520).”
- Cultural-economy and cities (2007, background): “In general, issues of culture – largely kept in the domain of social praxis or ideology – have been held to have relatively little influence on the basic laws of the economy or the deep structures of power, both conceived as ontologically separate with their own dynamic (Boyer, 2005).”
- The Importance of Employment Protection for Skill Development in Coordinated Market Economies (2007, background): “Regulationists are thus concerned with both systemic changes and endemic crises which have followed the decline of the classic Fordist production paradigm, and the persistent differences between LMEs and CMEs that are the central concern of the VOC literature (Amable, 2003; Boyer, 2005, 2006).”
- The Resilient Family Firm: Stakeholder Outcomes and Institutional Effects (2015, background): “, Hall & Soskice, 2001; Whitley, 2007) typically assume the existence of an “emblematic firm” (Boyer, 2005), which is a prevalent corporate form that is best adapted to benefit from opportunities provided by the particular institutional environment.”