Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience

By Ron A. Boschma. 2015

1,237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6a39297c4f1fa5d8068b9d2d0059a9c011638c8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Global investments and regional development trajectories: the missing links (2016, background): “Evolutionary economic geography has interpreted resilience in terms of the historical capacity of regions to reconfigure their socio-economic and institutional structures, enabling new development paths (for all, see Boschma, 2015; Martin & Sunley, 2014).”
Efforts to Implement Smart Specialization in Practice—Leading Unlike Horses to the Water (2015, background): “Apparently, the straightforward benefit of the RIS3 processes in terms of “discovery” was limited indeed, as Boschma (2014a) and Iacobucci (2014) suggested may happen.”
Regional economic resilience: the experience of the Italian local labor systems (2017, background): “Camagni and Capello (2015) point out that, especially in the recent economic downturn, second-ranked cities have outperformed large ones.”
Path Renewal in Old Industrial Regions: Possibilities and Limitations for Regional Innovation Policy (2015, methodology): “Well-known examples are the European RIS/RITTS initiatives1 as well as current programmes and strategies developed under the banner of smart specialization (LANDABASO et al., 2001; BOSCHMA, 2014; CAMAGNI and CAPELLO, 2013).”
Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? (2017, background): “In terms of policy strategies in light of path-dependent regional development it primarily focuses on related diversification, and more recently also on unrelated diversification (Boschma 2015) as mechanisms for new path development.”
Innovation policies for regional structuralchange: Combining actor-based andsystem-based strategies (2016, background): “There is a high potential for cross-industrial knowledge flows and new recombinations of knowledge (Boschma 2015).”
Exogenous sources of regional industrial change (2018, background): “RISs differ strongly in terms of their endowment of local (endogenous) assets (Boschma, 2015).”
Innovation and regional economic resilience: an exploratory analysis (2018, background): “…or recovery is exhibiting precisely the sort of adaptive capacity that is critical for its long-term transformation, i.e. its ability to respond to shocks and demonstrate adaptation may be constitutive of its capacity to develop new growth paths and demonstrate adaptability (Boschma 2015).”
Regional economic resilience in China: measurement and determinants (2021, background): “The UV is critical for adaptability and technological breakthroughs (Boschma, 2015).”
Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions (2018, background): “The presence of influential incumbent players is a potential barrier in particular for regions with low industrial diversification (Boschma, 2015).”
Local growth evolutions: recession, resilience and recovery (2015, background): “Hence, there is an increasing emphasis on collective and contextual features, including connectivity and networks, as being critical for local economic growth (Boschma, 2015).”
Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway (2021, background): “…have been left with little option but to evade the ‘specialization trap’ through relentless evolution to become productively active in new related or unrelated technological domains (Boschma, 2015; Kedron et al., 2019; Klepper, 2002; Kogler, 2015; Martin & Sunley, 2015; Murmann & Frenken, 2006).”
Recessions, recoveries and regional resilience: evidence on Italy (2015, background): “…the regional resilience perspective has undertaken an evolutionary turn (Christopherson et al., 2010; Pike et al., Martin and Sunley, 2014; Boschma, 2014), which points out the importance of looking at regions and local economies as complex systems, where time, space and agents are…”
The dark side of regional industrial path development: towards a typology of trajectories of decline (2019, background): “Finally, regional resilience is generally considered a desirable feature, not only as a form of recovery to a state preceding a shock, but more appropriately as a process enabling regions to ‘bounce forward’ and develop new growth paths (Boschma, 2015; Martin & Sunley, 2015).”