What Connects Industrial Relations and Corporate Governance? Explaining Institutional Complementarity

By M. Höpner. 2005

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/008f6e24397af89c795ba582c37f0c3e97155b29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Public Administration

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Labor Regulation, Corporate Governance, and Legal Origin: A Case of Institutional Complementarity? (2007, background): “Complementarities persist because they possess a degree of functionality: ‘the performance of a configuration increases when its elements assume specific properties’ (Höpner, 2005: 333).”
Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis of capitalism (2015, background): “…comparative institutional analyses of capitalism (Amable, 2000, 2003; Aoki, 1994, 2013; Boyer, 2004; Deeg and Jackson, 2007; Hall and Soskice, 2001; H¨opner, 2005), 1 in order to express the idea that certain institutional forms, when jointly present , reinforce each other and contribute to…”
E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism (2010, unknown): “Outside of functionalist concerns with economic performance, the existence of hybrid systems (Boyer in Crouch et al. 2005; Höpner 2005; Deeg 2009) can be taken as an indication that national institutions are not as tightly coupled as suggested, and are tolerant of a good deal of internal diversity…”
Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance (2006, background): “And their factor analysis suggests strongly that types of corporate governance arrangements and industrial relations systems do tend to cohere in a number of countries (see also Höpner, 2005).”
Gorillas in the closet? Public and private actors in the enforcement of transnational private regulation (2013, background): “Instead, they are suggestive of a relationship of complementarity, that is, a relationship in which one mechanism reinforces the functionality of the other, or compensates for its weaknesses (Höpner 2005; Campbell 2011).”
Collective and individual voice: convergence in Europe? (2007, background): “As Hopner (2005) notes, countries such as Germany and Sweden, characterized by strong labour market institutions, have highly organized governance within the firm; these have been referred to as stakeholder orientated or cooperative varieties of capitalism, as opposed to Anglo-Saxon…”
The Power of Transnational Private Governance: Financialization and the IASB (2007, unknown): “70 In each model, accounting standards have specific 64 IASB constitution 65 Barlev and Haddad 2003 66 Ibid:384 67 Damant 2001, 2003a 68 Aglietta and Reberioux 2005: ch 5 69 Höpner 2005: 331 70 Hall and Soskice 2001.”
Flexicurity: A conceptual critique (2011, methodology): “Our second issue concerns institutional complementarity, an increasingly popular concept in neo-institutional analysis and political economy which is used in a variety of ways in the literature (Crouch et al., 2005; Höpner, 2005).”
Varieties of Capitalism and institutional comparative advantage: A test and reinterpretation (2016, background): “Indeed, a growing literature on the relation between corporate governance and employment patterns suggest more complex relationships between these variables than found in the Varieties of Capitalism literature (Gospel & Pendleton, 2003, 2005; Höpner, 2005).”
The political economy debate on ‘financialization’ – a macroeconomic perspective (2009, unknown): “…4, we will develop these arguments with respect to financialisation in the USA and in Germany, which are (or used to be) seen as good examples of an LME and a CME respectively in the varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarity literature (e.g. Hall and Gingerich, 2004; Höpner, 2005).”