Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation

By R. Macpherson. 2000

1,840 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2cca895d6a2c1c596b6218a4e139fa9be6ba643

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Media Technology

Citations in the corpus

Debunking the 'digital native': beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy (2010, background): “The research literature has spawned a great deal of discussion about the age or generational aspects of young people today, with the dominant labels being used to categorize the present generation of students including Net Generation (Tapscott 1997; Oblinger & Oblinger 2005; Perillo 2007), ‘digital ”
Using 'tangibles' to promote novel forms of playful learning (2003, background): “In relation to learning, such tangibles are thought to provide different kinds of opportunities for reasoning about the world through discovery and participation (Soloway et al., 1994; Tapscott, 1998; Forrester and Jantzie, 2000).”
Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance (2010, background): “…have capabilities with advanced communication and information technologies, have the ability to see problems and opportunities from fresh perspectives, and are more comfortable working in teams than were past generations (Howe and Strauss 2000; Gorman et al. 2004; Tapscott 1998; Zemke et al. 2000).”
Implications of population ageing for the development of tourism products and destinations (2009, background): “Members of Generation X were born between 1966 and 1977 (Marconi, 2001; Tapscott, 1998).”
Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation (2007, background): “In this context, Vrasidas and McIsaac (1999) focused on not just interaction but meaningful interaction.”
Bridging the communication gap between Generation Y and the Baby Boomer generation (2017, background): “Other authors describe this generation using concepts such as digital natives (Prensky, 2001), the net generation (Tapscott, 1998), the web generation (Hartmann, 2003) or the Google generation (see Helsper & Enyon, 2009, p. 1).”
Age Differences in Media Multitasking: A Diary Study (2013, background): “The Net Generation had an average of 37.5 task combinations that were multitasked (out of the possible 66); Generation X-ers had an average of 32.4 task combinations, while the Baby Boomers had an average of only 23.2 combinations.”
Effective Literacy Instruction for Adolescents (2002, background): “The Internet figures prominently in the lives of American adolescents, sometimes referred to as the Net Generation (Tapscott, 1998).”
A Guide to Authentic e-Learning (2009, background): “Google and instant messaging are just two of many tools that the Net Generation use on campuses today (Oblinger & Oblinger, 2005).”
Race, Gender, and Information Technology Use: The New Digital Divide (2008, background): “12 Nevertheless, some studies do suggest race and gender differences.”
Current Perspectives on Personality and Internet Use (2010, background): “who are brought up with the Internet, that is, the so-called Net Generation (Tapscott, 1998), to see whether they continue to use the Internet as they age and whether patterns of Internet consumption remain consistent.”
Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning. (2008, background): “Described as, “Gen-X, Millennials, the Nintendo and Net Generation” (Tapscott, 1997; Oblinger, 2003; Olsen, 2005), these students blog, play games in immersive 3-”
Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context (2011, background): “In contrast, the proportion of Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants [87], or Net Generation [94] those who have been born into and are familiar with new technologies forms an important urban context that merits our attention, because the technology-savvy generation is likely to benefit from smart ”
The stress potential of social media in the workplace (2013, methodology): “The terms technology or computer literacy (Tapscott 1998; Leung 2009), media literacy (ALA 2000; Bawden 2001; Buckingham et al. 2004; Bundy 2004b; Buckingham 2008; Leung 2009), E-literacy, informacy, information fluency and smart working (Bawden 2001) have been used to describe particular forms of…”
Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning (2007, background): “Tapscott (1998) argued that this has created a generation of students who have become independent, inclusive, and innovative.”
The Use of Blogs, Wikis and RSS in Education: A Conversation of Possibilities (2006, background): “…such as collaborative content creation, peer assessment, formative evaluation of student work, individual as well as group reflection on learning experiences and user-centric up-to-date information regarding changes in collaborative spaces (Gilster, 1997; Tapscott, 1998; Eshet-Alkalai, 2004; 2005).”