The Role of Personality and Group Factors in Explaining Prejudice
By Katherine J. Reynolds, J. Turner, S. A. Haslam, Michelle K. Ryan. 2001
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d24de998c744f626dc4b5313edfd44a34bd33c0e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Nazar Akrami
- B. Ekehammar
- Ingrid Zakrisson
- S. Ibler
- J. Cohrs
- M. Verkuyten
- J. Duckitt
- Chris G. Sibley
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Prediction of negative attitudes toward Australian asylum seekers: False beliefs, nationalism, and self‐esteem (2005, background): “Here, comparisons are made between specific social groups that involve collective understandings (Reynolds et al., 2001).”
- The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003, background): “Reynolds, Turner, Haslam, & Ryan, 2001 ): differences in prejudice are due to differences in people’s personalities (personality psychology) or due to differences in people’s group membership (social psychology).”
- What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism? (2004, background): “Further, RWA has been shown to be related to biological, symbolic, aversive racism, ethnocentrism, blatant and subtle prejudice (Van Hiel & Mervielde, paper submitted for publication), modern racism (Reynolds et al., 2001), prejudice toward Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands (Verkuyten & Hagendoo”
- The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, unknown): “433) Reynolds et al. (2007) The social identity perspective .”
- Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Their Roots in Big-Five Personality Fa (2006, background): “However, some recent research has questioned whether RWA and SDO can be classified as personality variables at all (e.g., Duckitt et al., 2002; Duriez, Van Hiel, & Kossowska, 2005; Guimond et al., 2003; Kreindler, 2005; Reynolds et al., 2001; Van Hiel, Pandelaere, & Duriez, 2004).”
- Authoritarianism, Threat, and Prejudice: An Analysis of Mediation and Moderation (2009, background): “Although individual differences in RWA are very stable (Altemeyer, 1988 ) and RWA did not differ between conditions in our study, participants might have interpreted the meaning of the RWA items differently between conditions, with different features of the Turkish-German relations made salient (Re”
- Support for Multiculturalism and Minority Rights: The Role of National Identification and Out-group Threat (2009, background): “Experimental research has shown that individual differences in authoritarianism tend to become irrelevant to prejudice where group membership is salient (e.g., Reynolds et al., 2001; Verkuyten & Hagendoorn, 1998, but see Heaven & St. Quintin, 2003).”