Firm size and dynamic technological innovation
By G. Stock, N. Greis, W. Fischer. 2002
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d1636057c3f00b4b55f7a3b00f04a1af3446cca5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Service innovation and performance in SMEs (2012, background): “4 The issue of organizational size The question of whether organizational size has an effect on innovation activities and outcomes has been the subject of a great deal of controversy and research (Stock et al., 2002).”
- Knowledge-based Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation in Networked Environments (2011, unknown): “Size was included as control variable in this study since firm size may have significant influence on firm innovation behavior and results (Stock et al., 2002; Shefer and Frenkel, 2005).”
- How cultural organizations’ size and funding influence innovation and performance: the case of museums (2011, background): “There is abundant literature on the topic, with examples to support both arguments: the positive impact of size on innovation (Cohen and Klepper 1996; Bertschek and Entorf 1996), and its negative impact (Shefer and Frenkel 2005; Stock et al. 2002; Laforet 2008), or even no impact whatsoever (Kamien ”
- Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation with Innovation Performance in SMEs; the Role of Organizational Commitment and Transformational Leadership Using Smart PLS-SEM (2021, background): “Firms also aim at the administrative and technological innovation performance [61,62].”
- Technological Collaboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and Large Firms** (2010, unknown): “The contradictory nature of both the conceptual and empirical findings, however, does not provide clear guidance on what to expect in general (Stock, Greis, and Fischer 2002, p. 541).”