Language loss and language processing : three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand

By M. Hulsen. 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cfa4b12f58b1fb9e9824f39804c4a590c44d30fa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers (2009, background): “Existing research on adult attrition shows that the most affected areas are lexical retrieval (Hulsen, 2000), phonetics values (Major, 1992), and some referential and discourse-related aspects of language (Gürel, 2004; Tsimpli, Sorace, Heycock, & Filiaci, 2004).”
Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition (2004, background): “For example, de Bot & Clyne (1994), Hulsen (2000), Jordens et al. (1989) and Schoenmakers-Klein Gunnewiek (1998) found little or no attrition in first generation immigrants, and in many other studies communication in L1 did not appear to be severely disrupted by attrition (e.g., Altenberg, 1991; de…”
The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans (2004, background): “These and other studies (Ammerlaan, 1996; Hulsen, 2000) in adults have found some evidence for attrition such as lexical retrieval difficulties, errors in syntax and even in productive phonology (Major, 1992), but compared with the extensive attrition apparent in children such evidence is minimal.”
Is the heritage language like a second language (2012, background): “We know that lexical knowledge, retrieval and access are highly affected in L1 attrition, especially nouns (Hulsen, 2000).”
Language attrition at the crossroads of brain, mind, and society (2007, background): “It has been shown, for example, that lexical access in a picture/word matching task is easier than lexical retrieval in a naming task (Ammerlaan 1996; Hulsen 2000), two tasks with very different requirements regarding the level of activation needed for their accomplishment.”
The role of L1 use for L1 attrition (2007, background): “• impaired performance on lexical naming and/or fluency tasks (slower responses, reduced accuracy, e.g. Ammerlaan 1996; Hulsen 2000)”
Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers* (2009, background): “While language attrition in adults appears to affect lexical retrieval (Hulsen, 2000), phonetics (Major, 1993), and some superficial discourse-related aspects of language (Sorace, 2000), the outcome of incomplete acquisition appears to have deeper consequences in adulthood, affecting both core and…”
Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition: the impact of extralinguistic factors (2010, methodology): “…judgements (e.g. de Bot et al., 1991; Grosjean and Py, 1991; Pelc, 2001), picture verification tasks (Tsimpli et al., 2004), naming tasks (e.g. Ammerlaan, 1996; Schoenmakers-Klein Gunnewiek, 1998; Hulsen, 2000) and cloze or fill-in tests (Hakuta and d’Andrea, 1992; Gürel, 2000; Montrul, 2002).”