The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Computational Evidence That Frequency Trajectory Theory Does Not Oppose But Emerges From Age-of-Acquisition Theory (2012, unknown): “Thus, it would seem that early exposure to a language is not enough to leave permanent traces in the brain (see also Ventureyra, Pallier, & Yoo, 2004).”
Critical periods in speech perception: new directions. (2015, background): “The loss of first language phonetic perception in adopted Koreans.”
Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. (2005, background): “, 2003), Koreanspeaking children who were adopted into French-speaking homes and subsequently not again exposed to Korean performed like French speakers on perception of Korean phonetic contrasts (Ventureyra et al., 2004).”
Dominant-language replacement: The case of international adoptees* (2009, background): “As mentioned above, the present article focuses on the current position on dominant-language replacement expressed by Pallier et al. (2003) and Ventureyra et al. (2004).”
The development of phonetic representation in bilingual and monolingual infants (2007, background): “As adults, these individuals showed no evidence of discrimination of Korean-specific phonetic contrasts ( Ventureyra, Pallier, & Yoo, 2004 ).”