Collapse and recovery of marine fishes
By J. A. Hutchings. Nature, 2000
991 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf9c6032068b9ef67adbf3aaa4eb8297df5c1b36
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- LONG-TERM TREND IN THE MATURATION REACTION NORM OF TWO COD STOCKS (2004, background): “In this context, the reason why some stocks, in particular the Northwest Atlantic cod stocks, are not rebuilding is unclear (Hutchings 2000a).”
- Optimal growth temperature hypothesis: Why do anchovy flourish and sardine collapse or vice versa under the same ocean regime? (2007, background): “In particular, fishing pressure could prevent stock recovery when the spawning biomass was too low (Hutchings 2000; Shelton et al. 2006).”
- Towards sustainability in world fisheries (2002, background): “There is actually little support, though, for the general assumption that the most highly fecund marine fish species are less susceptible to overexploitation; rather it seems that this perception is flawe”
- MARINE RESERVE DESIGN AND THE EVOLUTION OF SIZE AT MATURATION IN HARVESTED FISH (2005, background): “Heavy exploitation in marine systems occurs frequently and has lasting effects (Botsford et al. 1997, Hutchings 2000, Myers and Worm 2003).”
- Fish abundance with no fishing: Predictions based on macroecological theory (2004, background): “2000), genetic selection for small body size (Law 2000) and interspecies interactions (Hutchings 2000).”
- Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database (2012, background): “…investigate density dependence in juvenile mortality (Myers 2001; Minto et al. 2008), (v) develop informative Bayesian priors on steepness (Myers et al. 1999, 2002a; Dorn 2002) and (vi) examine patterns of collapse and recovery in exploited fish populations (Hilborn 1997; Hutchings 2000, 2001a,b).”
- Fisheries-Induced Selection Pressures in the Context of Sustainable Fisheries (2002, background): “…not yet seriously considered in fisheries management, is genetic change in individual stocks in response to the selective effects of fishing (Hutchings, 2000b; Stokes and Law, 2000), which may adversely affect long-term yield and other stock properties (Sheridan, 1995; Trippel, 1995;…”
- Lessons learned from stock collapse and recovery of North Sea herring: a review (2010, background): “The genetic composition of large marine fish stocks has long been assumed fundamentally resilient to depletion, because even a collapsed stock might still comprise millions of individuals (Hutchings, 2000).”
- Conservation biology of marine fishes: perceptions and caveats regarding assignment of extinction risk (2001, background): “As argued elsewhere (Hutchings 2000b), such an increased rate of recovery may be attributable to the comparatively younger age at which clupeids mature (Froese and Pauly 1999) and the higher intrinsic rate of increase that earlier maturity generally effects (Roff 1992).”
- Comparison of threat and exploitation status in North‐East Atlantic marine populations (2005, result): “Analyses of declines suggest threat criteria thresholds adequately reflect the observed recovery potentials of fish stocks and are consistent with the precautionary approach to fisheries management ( Hutchings 2000, 2001a, b).”
- Risks of ignoring fish population spatial structure in fisheries management (2011, background): “The importance of considering spatial structure in the management of metapopulation fisheries was described in several studies (e.g., Hutchings 2000; Hutchinson 2008).”
- How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management (2003, background): “Myers et al. 1995; Dobson and Poole 1998; Reed 1999; Hutchings 2000; Berec et al. 2001, Kokko and Sutherland 2001), and species distribution (Keitt et al. 2001).”