How can we apply theories of habitat selection to wildlife conservation and management

By D. Morris. 2003

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c549f7d35c44cadc707ff9805559013b13fdc1e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Matthew D. Johnson
2. J. Stamps
3. R. Swaisgood
4. M. Patten

In Ecology

1. R. Swaisgood
2. Matthew D. Johnson
3. J. Stamps
4. E. Shochat
5. D. Morris
6. M. Patten
7. C. Lindell
8. A. Rodewald

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Matthew D. Johnson
2. J. Stamps
3. R. Swaisgood
4. E. Shochat
5. D. Morris
6. M. Patten
7. C. Lindell
8. E. Morrison

Citations in the corpus

• Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success (2005, background): “Isodar theory can be applied to solve numerous problems in management and conservation (Morris 2003).”
• MEASURING HABITAT QUALITY: A REVIEW (2007, background): “Thus, researchers should first establish how well a given system adheres to patterns of ideal habitat selection before using animal distribution to reveal variation in habitat quality (Clark and Shutler 1999, Pulliam 2000, Morris 2003, Zimmerman et al. 2003).”
• Someplace like home: Experience, habitat selection and conservation biology (2007, background): “Although classical habitat selection theory assumes that animals can accurately estimate the quality of any type of habitat that they encounter during search (Fretwell and Lucas, 1970; Brown, 1998; Morris, 2003), this assumption is unlikely to apply to many free-living natal dispersers (Stamps, 2001”