Conservation biology of marine fishes: perceptions and caveats regarding assignment of extinction risk

By J. A. Hutchings. 2001

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1d3ccbfc3ce5b251bc2d7a4c50a62ecb2043d69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Jennings
2. N. Dulvy
3. A. Grant
4. J. Reynolds
5. N. B. Goodwin
6. Julian D. Olden
7. J. Baum
8. J. Ellis

In Global and Planetary Change

1. N. Dulvy
2. S. Jennings
3. J. Reynolds
4. A. Grant
5. N. B. Goodwin
6. J. Baum
7. Julian D. Olden
8. O. Jensen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. N. Dulvy
2. S. Jennings
3. J. Reynolds
4. A. Grant
5. N. B. Goodwin
6. Julian D. Olden
7. J. Ellis
8. J. Baum

Citations in the corpus

• Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database (2012, background): “…investigate density dependence in juvenile mortality (Myers 2001; Minto et al. 2008), (v) develop informative Bayesian priors on steepness (Myers et al. 1999, 2002a; Dorn 2002) and (vi) examine patterns of collapse and recovery in exploited fish populations (Hilborn 1997; Hutchings 2000, 2001a,b).”
• Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground (2004, background): “, 2000), and it has been argued that increases in the population-decline thresholds used to assign marine fish species to at-risk categories would be inconsistent with the precautionary approach (Hutchings, 2001).”
• Methods of assessing extinction risk in marine fishes. (2004, background): “…histories are linked to low maximum rates of population growth and consequently species exhibiting such life histories are intrinsically more vulnerable to exploitation and have less capacity to recover from exploitation (Hutchings 2001a; Reynolds et al. 2001, 2002; Hutchings and Reynolds 2004).”
• Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world's freshwater and marine fishes. (2007, background): “Although we recognize the potential biases and limitations of the IUCN listing procedure for fishes (e.g. Musick, 1999; Hutchings, 2001), it is the most comprehensive and accurate account of the threatened status of fishes across the globe.”
• Predicting Extinction Vulnerability in Skates (2002, background): “Fisheries have caused severe declines in many species, but there are still no documented cases of complete extinction, and there is considerable debate as to whether marine species could become extinct (Roberts & Hawkins 1999; Hutchings 2001; Jennings et al. 2001).”
• Comparison of threat and exploitation status in North‐East Atlantic marine populations (2005, background): “The understanding of extinction risk in marine organisms is poor, partly as a result of the controversy over whether the methods, originally developed for assessing threat in mammals and birds, can be applied to exploited marine species (Musick 1999; Hutchings 2001a ).”
• An overview of recent global experience with recovery plans for depleted marine resources and suggested guidelines for recovery planning (2004, background): “The international context for plans to prevent extinction as opposed to commercial recovery, is the Biodiversity Convention and CITES, and a number of papers (e.g. Musick, 1999; Roberts and Hawkins, 1999; Musik et al., 2000; Powles et al., 2000; Hutchings, 2001), review the probability of extinction”
• Status, trends and the future of the marine pelagic ecosystem (2002, background): “The ability to establish the population of origin for individual fish may prove invaluable in maximizing sustainable exploitation (Nielsen et al. 2001), however there is little evidence for rapid recovery from large population reductions (Hutchings 2000, 2001).”