MARINE RESERVE DESIGN AND THE EVOLUTION OF SIZE AT MATURATION IN HARVESTED FISH
By Marissa L. Baskett, Simon A. Levin, S. Gaines, Jonathan Dushoff. 2005
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/12e06ea4187670dae508f359c7c4da819daff727
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Marissa L. Baskett
- Stephen R. Palumbi
- S. Gaines
- Nils Chr. Stenseth
- D. Hjermann
- Lewis A. K. Barnett
- Geir Ottersen
- Esben Moland Olsen
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Esben Moland Olsen
- Nils Chr. Stenseth
- M. Carr
- M. Hidalgo
- Marissa L. Baskett
- D. Marshall
- Stephen R. Palumbi
- E. Moland
Citations in the corpus
- The Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Marine Reserves (2015, background): “For populations with sessile adults and dispersive larvae, if short-distance dispersal occurs, reserves can protect against fisheries-induced evolution within reserves boundaries with little effect on fisheries-induced evolution outside reserves (Baskett et al. 2005).”
- Fitness landscape of Atlantic cod shaped by harvest selection and natural selection (2011, background): “…this approach has also been suggested as a way of countering negative evolutionary effects of harvesting, by allowing some proportion of the individuals in a population to complete their life history under natural selection only (Conover and Munch 2002; Baskett et al. 2005; Miethe et al. 2010).”
- Ocean's eleven: a critical evaluation of the role of population, evolutionary and molecular genetics in the management of wild fisheries (2015, background): “Examples of ways to reduce the risk of evolutionary change in fisheries include the following: reducing the selectivity of fishing methods, reducing overall fishing mortality and maintaining large populations that retain the full range of phenotypes for natural selection to act upon, either by setti”
- Shifting dynamic forces in fish stock fluctuations triggered by age truncation? (2011, background): “The use of MPAs has already been proposed to counteract the effects of fishing selection on the evolution of life history traits (Baskett et al., 2005).”
- Spatial and temporal scales of adaptive divergence in marine fishes and the implications for conservation (2006, methodology): “Building on the earlier work of Trexler & Travis (2000), Baskett et al. (2005) used a quantitative genetic model to demonstrate that no-take reserves can protect against fisheries-based selection for early maturation and thereby increase yield and protect against population collapse.”
- Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management (2010, background): “Reserves increase biomass contribution to harvested populations by buffering against evolution for reduced size at maturity (98).”
- Assessing evolutionary consequences of size-selective recreational fishing on multiple life-history traits, with an application to northern pike (Esox lucius) (2011, unknown): “Nevertheless, HSL-Ls have been shown to be effective in reducing selection 7 on maturation size, both in our model and elsewhere (Baskett et al. 2005).”
- Underestimating the benefits of marine protected areas for the replenishment of fished populations (2019, background): “Theory suggests that MPAs, if sufficiently widespread, can impede the evolution of harvestingadapted phenotypes, maintaining the original phenotypic distribution of the exploited species (Baskett et al. 2005).”