Comparison of threat and exploitation status in North‐East Atlantic marine populations

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fuelling the decline in UK fishing communities (2010, background): “Many European fish stocks are overexploited, and the fleets suffer from excess capacity, threatening the profitability of EU fisheries (Cook et al., 1997; Piet and Rice, 2004; Dulvy et al., 2005; FAO, 2006).”
Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays (2013, background): “Consequently, SSG scientists generally agreed in assigning threat categories to species that had undergone large declines, but many were reluctant to assign a VU classification to species that were perceived to be at or near 50% virgin population levels and presumably near BMSY.”
Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts (2008, background): “Atlantic cod, Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus, Pleuronectidae), dogfish (Squalus acanthias, Squalidae)] were precipitated by large declines in biomass rather than by small population sizes, triggering a controversy about true extinction risks in those species (Dulvy et al. 2005).”
Ocean acidification exacerbates the impacts of global warming on embryonic little skate, Leucoraja erinacea (Mitchill) (2015, background): “erinacea has a relatively wide geographic range, this species may be vulnerable to local extirpation because of the limited capacity for shifting its range (Dulvy and Reynolds, 2002; Dulvy et al., 2005).”