How Interactive are YOUR Distance Courses? A Rubric for Assessing Interaction in Distance Learning

By M. Roblyer. 2000

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce28bcad93a14b7a90a51b7637c8a025f86cfde3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Doris U. Bolliger
2. Florence Martin
3. R. Rodriguez
4. Lana C. Jackson
5. Stephanie J. Jones
6. Papia Bawa
7. Saleh Al-Salman
8. Hasnan Baber

Citations in the corpus

• Retention in Online Courses (2016, methodology): “Shay and Rees’s (2004) research data indicate something similar.”
• Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. (2018, background): “The need for engagement has resulted in the development of guidelines for designing effective online courses (Roblyer & Ekhaml, 2000).”
• Faculty Actions that Result in Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. (2010, background): “Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, and Pelz [12] and Roblyer and Ekhaml [14] further argued that quantity and quality of interactions in the online classroom directly correlated with student satisfaction and learning.”