Knowledge management and innovation performance

By B. Lundvall, Peter V. Nielsen. 2007

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce0fb559a0c4103c99558ce61fb53745c177ca01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. S. Høyrup
2. Nianxin Wang
3. Léo‐Paul Dana
4. Zhining Wang

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Veland Ramadani
2. S. Høyrup
3. Nianxin Wang
4. Léo‐Paul Dana
5. Zhining Wang

In Strategy and Management

1. Nianxin Wang
2. Zhining Wang
3. S. Høyrup
4. Abdul-Nasser Kassar
5. Yong-fan Li
6. Chengwei Li
7. Manal M. Yunis
8. Abbas Tarhini

Citations in the corpus

• Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: basic concepts, approaches and themes (2010, background): “Lundvall and Nielson argue, with regard to firms in the global economy, that organizations that focus on learning and development (innovation) are more likely to produce innovative solutions, which is a precondition for coping with global competition (Lundvall and Nielson, 2007).”
• Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry (2019, background): “Many researchers have also pointed out that an enterprise that facilitates the sharing of knowledge practices within a team or the entire organization tends to generate new ideas for introducing new business opportunities, thereby fostering innovation and improving innovation performance [107,108].”
• Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance (2012, background): “Exchange of knowledge between individuals brings knowledge sources together andmanipulates it into new knowledge structures or routines (Jo, Richard, BellaYa-Hui, Chi-Min,&Peter, 2008;Kumar&Ganesh, 2009;Minguela-Rata, Lopez-Sanchez, & Rodriguez-Benavides, 2010). Van den Hooff and De Ridder (2004) ha”
• The impact of knowledge spillovers and innovation on firm-performance: findings from the Balkans countries (2017, background): “KM contributes the firms to improve the efficiency of their business processes, productivity and quality (Donate and Sánchez de Pablo 2015), and their innovation performance (Alegrem et al. 2011).”
• The role of ICT and innovation in enhancing organizational performance: The catalysing effect of corporate entrepreneurship (2017, result): “This is in conformity with the previous research (Lundvall & Nielsen, 2007).”