Portraits of the self
By Constantine Sedikides, A. Gregg. 2003
361 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccb180aad016188bc6e205f182f28203a070aefc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Constantine Sedikides
- David de Cremer
- M. Hogg
- T. Wildschut
- Barbara van Knippenberg
- D. van Knippenberg
- Jeffrey D. Green
- M. Riketta
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Constantine Sedikides
- T. Wildschut
- C. Routledge
- Jamie Arndt
- David de Cremer
- Jeffrey D. Green
- Matthew Vess
- Robert J. Vallerand
In Sociology and Political Science
- Constantine Sedikides
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
- T. Wildschut
- Barbara van Knippenberg
- M. Hogg
- C. Routledge
- Jeffrey D. Green
Citations in the corpus
- Faking in Personality Assessment: A “Multisaturation” Perspective on Faking as Performance (2011, background): “Describing oneself, truthfully or not, entails a complex set of cognitive processes, including storage and retrieval of self-images based on past experiences in diverse situations (eg, Markus, 1977 ), filtered by self-enhancement biases and other protective mechanisms ( Dunning, Heath, & Suls, 2004”
- Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self: Hierarchical Ordering of the Tripartite Self (2011, background): “…credit for a dyadic or group success while displacing blame to others, derogate conveyors of unfavorable feedback, and, when they cannot negate such feedback, recall it poorly or devalue the feedback dimension (Alicke and Govorun 2005; Brown 1998; Sedikides and Gregg 2003; Shepperd et al. 2008).”
- Possible links between self-awareness and inner speech: Theoretical background, underlying mechanisms, and empirical evidence (2004, background): “It should be noted that people can engage in dysfunctional self-talk, distort or deny self-information, and thus misrepresent their self-concept for self-enhancing purposes (Sedikides and Gregg, 2004).”
- Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do (2009, background): “…namely the tendency for people to exaggerate their virtues and to minimise their shortcomings, as well as to construe or remember events in a way that places their attributes in the most favourable light that is credible to oneself and others (Alicke & Govorun, 2005; Sedikides & Gregg, 2003, 2008).”
- Beyond self-esteem: influence of multiple motives on identity construction. (2006, background): “This motive is involved in an enormous range of theories to which we cannot do justice here (reviewed by Hoyle et al., 1999; Sedikides & Gregg, 2003).”
- A Self-Motives Perspective on Feedback-Seeking Behavior: Linking Organizational Behavior and Social Psychology Research (2007, background): “…that this issue is also heavily debated in social psychology, we believe it is up to future empirical research to examine which motive is dominant in the long-term and whether there is indeed a dominant motive (for a detailed debate of this issue, see Sedikides and Gregg 2003; Swann et al. 2002).”
- Social psychology of exercise and sport (2005, background): “While this may be true, there is evidence to suggest that high levels of self-esteem could be accompanied by maladaptive outcomes and behaviours (Sedikides and Gregg 2003).”
- Self-esteem and passion for activities (2011, background): “Self-esteem is defined as an evaluation of, or an attitude toward, oneself (Sedikides & Gregg, 2003, 2008; Sedikides & Strube, 1997).”
- Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought (2008, background): “That is, self-assessment, by subserving subsequent selfimprovement, can tactically facilitate eventual self-enhancement (Sedikides & Gregg, 2003).”
- Entrepreneurs' Social Skills and New Venture Performance: Mediating Mechanisms and Cultural Generality (2009, background): “That is, the range and quality of the relationships entrepreneurs form with other persons strongly influences their access to crucial forms of information (e.g., Sedikides & Gregg, 2003; Singh, 2000).”
- Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda (2004, background): “In addition, the self evolves from interaction with others, and functions as a regulator of these social interactions (e.g., Lord & Brown, 2004; Sedikides & Gregg, 2003).”
- Trait and State Authenticity Across Cultures (2014, background): “Given that SDT needs and self-esteem are universally important for well-being (Church et al., 2012; Sedikides & Gregg, 2003, 2008), that the satisfaction of many additional needs correlates with authenticity, and that these various psychological needs are not independent of one another (Heppner et…”
- When Is Identity Congruent with the Self? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective (2011, background): “Research typically found correlations around 0.30 between intrinsic goal striving and autonomous regulation and between extrinsic goal striving and controlled regulation ( Sebire, Standage, & Vansteenkiste, 2008, 2009; Sheldon & Kasser, 1995; Sheldon, Ryan, Deci, & Kasser, 2004).”
- Narcissistic Fragility: Rethinking Its Links to Explicit and Implicit Self-esteem (2010, background): “Self-esteem is commonly defined as a positive or negative attitude towards oneself (Sedikides & Gregg, 2003 ).”
- Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy?: self-esteem matters. (2004, neutral): “The SSB is a robust phenomenon (W. K. Campbell & Sedikides, 1999; Sedikides & Gregg, 2003), but a rare exception occurs when participants collaborate on an interdependent (i.e., joint outcomes) task with a close other.”
- “How much do you like your name?” An implicit measure of global self-esteem (2008, background): “Self-esteem is one of the most strongly researched topics in psychology ( Sedikides & Gregg, 2003; Swann, Chang-Schneider, & McClarty, 2007).”
- Memory as a self-protective mechanism (2009, methodology): “The mnemic neglect model (Sedikides, Green, & Pinter, 2004) portrays the self-concept as a complex, predominantly positive, and motivationally imbued mental representation (Sedikides & Gregg, 2003; Sedikides & Spencer, 2007).”