Memory as a self-protective mechanism
By Constantine Sedikides, Jeffrey D. Green. 2009
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/351912991b395372fb78ab83e7a02a1ef37171dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Constantine Sedikides
- Jeffrey D. Green
- Jo Saunders
- Bettina Zengel
- John J. Skowronski
- Huajian Cai
- Alison P. Lenton
- Martin Bruder
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Constantine Sedikides
- Jeffrey D. Green
- Jo Saunders
- Bettina Zengel
- John J. Skowronski
- S. Iso-Ahola
- C. Dotson
- L. Gaertner
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Constantine Sedikides
- Jo Saunders
- Bettina Zengel
- John J. Skowronski
- Huajian Cai
- S. Iso-Ahola
- C. Dotson
- Alison P. Lenton
Citations in the corpus
- Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults (2016, methodology): “Table 1b shows the average pattern of MNEs (from Wells, 2012) that emerged from the corpus of experiments reviewed by Sedikides and Green (2009).”
- Trait and State Authenticity Across Cultures (2014, background): “For example, people’s enduring goals or motives shape their autobiographical memories (McLean, Pasupathi, & Pals, 2007; Sedikides & Green, 2009; Sutin & Robins, 2005).”
- On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: the case for the universality of self-esteem (2015, background): “…(but not negative feedback about unimportant self-attributes or about attributes pertaining to another person) is remembered poorly compared to positive feedback about important selfattributes (Sedikides & Green, 2009), is observed both in the West and the East (Tan, Newman, & Zhang, 2014).”
- Psychological Momentum: Why Success Breeds Success (2014, background): “In general, people readily process positive feedback because it affirms their self-views, whereas they refrain from negative feedback because it threatens their self-perceptions (Sedikides & Green, 2009).”