Effects of Board Structure on Firm Performance: A Comparison Between Japan and Australia

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain (2015, result): “Hence, in line with previous studies (e.g., Bonn et al. 2004; Campbell and Mı́nguez-Vera 2008; Carter et al. 2003; Erhardt et al. 2003), we suggest that firms increase female representation on their boards, since it positively influences their economic results.”
Board Age and Gender Diversity: A Test of Competing Linear and Curvilinear Predictions (2014, background): “For instance, the non-significant findings pertaining to the age diversity-performance relationship (Bonn, 2004; Bonn et al., 2004; Jhunjhunwala & Mishra, 2012) may be attributed to the lack of focus on the curvilinear relationship – the scholars did not include a squared age diversity term in…”
Governance Mechanisms and Firm Value: The Impact of Ownership Concentration and Dividends (2009, background): “Compared with prior studies in Australia, results on board independence are consistent with Bonn et al. (2004), who studied firms in 1999, but inconsistent with Lawrence and Stapledon (1999), who found that independent directors are not related to firm value in the period 1985–1995.”
Women in the boardroom and their impact on climate change related disclosure (2017, background): “In order words, it suggests that it is difficult for a large board to co-ordinate and be involved in strategic decision-making (Bonn et al., 2004).”