Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure

By Tom Tyler. 2000

747 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc2ccef73cec5f17eff3dde4a06658e93b21d67d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm (2010, background): “The referendum was likely to give inhabitants of Stockholm the feeling that fair procedures were followed, which is an important precondition for the acceptability of policies (Tyler, 2000).”
Justice from within: The relations between a procedurally just organizational climate and police organizational efficiency, endorsement of democratic policing, and officer well-being. (2016, background): “There has been much debate about the components of procedural justice, with scholars proposing a range of distinct and overlapping characteristics (Tyler, 2000).”
Victims’ experiences in the criminal justice system and their recovery from crime (2013, background): “Determinants of procedural justice judgments that are found in the literature include the quality of victims’ interactions with authorities and the quality of procedures (Blader and Tyler, 2003; Brockner et al., 1994; Tyler, 2000; Tyler and Bies, 1990; Tyler and Lind, 1992; Wemmers, 1996).”
Process‐orientation versus outcome‐orientation during organizational change: the role of organizational identification (2006, background): “Higher identification may, for instance, lead to more organizational citizenship behavior, increased effort, and support for and loyalty towards the organization (Ashforth & Mael, 1989; Dutton et al., 1994; Mael & Ashforth, 1992; Tyler & Blader, 2000; van Dick, Wagner, Stellmacher, & Christ, 2004).”
Victim satisfaction with restorative justice (2013, methodology): “After reviewing social-psychological studies on procedural justice and its determinants, Tyler (2000) listed neutrality, trust, respect and voice as the key factors in judgements about fairness.”
The moral economy of inequality: popular views on income differentiation, poverty and wealth (2012, result): “Furthermore, the findings are in line with social psychological studies that stress the importance of just procedures in assessing the legitimacy of societal arrangements (Tyler, 2000).”
Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct (2015, background): “…apply those rules without prejudice and bias, (b) prisoners should be treated with respect and dignity, and (c) prisoners should be given the opportunity to state their case and highlight their view before decisions are made by staff (Jackson et al., 2010; Tyler, 2000; Tyler & Lind, 1992).”
Procedural Justice and Tax Compliance (2003, background): “procedures those agencies use to exercise their authority (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler, 2000;”
Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda (2014, background): “Perceived distributive fairness depends on how people evaluate the balance between the costs that a certain group faces and the benefits it receives, in comparison to other groups [29], which is particularly relevant when a certain community has to host an energy facility (and hence for community ac”
The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining $ (2014, methodology): “Procedural fairness refers to whether individuals perceive that they have had a reasonable voice in a decision-making process (Besley, 2010; Tyler, 2000).”
Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. (2009, neutral): “Research has shown that fairness is a primary dimension that people use to evaluate the processes and treatment they encounter in their groups (Tyler, 2000; Tyler & Blader, 2000).”