Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm
By G. Schuitema, L. Steg, S. Forward. 2010
342 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e5eb695c495fb3f4f9150ed199460c34283c9411
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Andreas Nilsson
- L. Steg
- Satoshi Fujii
- J. D. de Groot
- R. Gifford
- K. Lacasse
- K. Keizer
- S. van der Linden
In Economics and Econometrics
- L. Steg
- Andreas Nilsson
- Emma Ejelöv
- Junghwa Kim
- Jan-Dirk Schmöcker
- Robert B. Noland
- Satoshi Fujii
- Steffen Kallbekken
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Andreas Nilsson
- L. Steg
- Emma Ejelöv
- Satoshi Fujii
- R. Gifford
- J. D. de Groot
- K. Keizer
- G. Perlaviciute
Citations in the corpus
- Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students (2013, methodology): “5 The term acceptability is typically used for hypothetical or not yet implemented schemes whereas for implemented schemes the term acceptance is typically used (see Gärling et al, 2008 or Schuitema et al 2010).”
- Individual Factors Influencing Acceptability for Environmental Policies: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “Perceiving individual outcomes in terms of behavioral, as opposed to financial, costs, has been shown to be positively linked to acceptability of transport pricing policy [76].”
- Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally (2016, background): “Acceptability may change after a policy has been implemented if the relevant policy proves to have more positive (and less negative) consequences than people anticipated beforehand (119).”