The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse

By Elly Ifantidou. 2005

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc14d0d0fe5277a6b7281a55efffa080d3bd55e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Douglas Biber

In Language and Linguistics

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Douglas Biber
4. Jim McKinley
5. Shih-Chieh Chien
6. A. Molino
7. R. Ruegg
8. Shulin Yu

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Feng Kevin Jiang
2. Ken Hyland
3. Raffaella Negretti
4. Douglas Biber
5. A. Molino
6. Jim McKinley
7. Shih-Chieh Chien
8. Paul Thompson

Citations in the corpus

• “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse (2018, background): “Mauranen; 1993; Dahl, 2004), to illocutionary predicates (Beauvais, 1989) or to a relevance framework (Ifantidou, 2005).”