Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey of Prototype Design and Evaluation

By M. Santos, Angie Chen, Takafumi Taketomi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Jun Miyazaki, Hirokazu Kato. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2014

434 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review (2021, background): “As a result, unnecessary cognitive load might be reduced or kept low and thus promote learning and task performance (Bressler & Bodzin, 2013; Goff et al., 2018; Santos et al., 2014, 2016; Sommerauer & Müller, 2014, 2018).”
A systematic review of augmented reality applications in maintenance (2018, methodology): “Santos [72] mentioned “authoring tools” as one of the AR contents-related issues, together with instruction design and content management tools.”
Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications (2014, background): “(Santos et al., 2014) The review considered papers published in IEEE Xplore.”
Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education : A systematic review of the literature (2017, background): “For example, Santos et al. (2014) showed that AR juxtaposes real objects, virtual text, and other symbols (e.g., images, videos), which reduces cognitive load in the limited working memory.”
Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students' laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories (2016, background): “Mayer has shown that certain principles in this theory are directly related to AR annotation applications (Santos et al., 2014).”