Images of Women in General Interest and Fashion Magazine Advertisements from 1955 to 2002
By Katharina Lindner. 2004
265 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Marketing, Museology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb33a74b20827e2a56be89e24b6666c6b23aa761
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Ann M. Merriwether
- Allison S Caruthers
- Yann Verhellen
- F. Rosselli
- Julie Stankiewicz
- L. Monique Ward
- Ji Yoon Kim
- Kimberly A. Neuendorf
In Marketing
- Yann Verhellen
- F. Rosselli
- Julie Stankiewicz
- L. Monique Ward
- Ji Yoon Kim
- Kimberly A. Neuendorf
- Kyounghee Chu
- Nathalie Dens
In Museology
Citations in the corpus
- Breasts Are for Men: Media, Masculinity Ideologies, and Men’s Beliefs About Women’s Bodies (2006, background): “First, findings show that the role of sexual object is a central way in which women are featured (e.g., Lindner, 2004; Reichert & Carpenter, 2004).”
- The effect of non-stereotypical gender role advertising on consumer evaluation (2016, background): “The way women are portrayed in advertisements has long been a source of concern and the focus of study among scholars of social science and communication (Lindner 2004).”
- A longitudinal content analysis of gender role portrayal in Belgian television advertising (2016, background): “A second gap in previous research is that a large part of extant content analyses on gender role stereotypes in advertising has been limited to print ads (e.g. Lindner 2004).”
- Content Analysis—A Methodological Primer for Gender Research (2011, methodology): “Research on gender images in advertising seems to be particularly popular in recent years (An and Kim 2007; Baker 2005; Fullerton and Kendrick 2000; Ibroscheva 2007; Lindner 2004; Messineo 2008; Odekerken-Schroder et al. 2002; Uray and Burnaz 2003; Valls-Fernandez and Martinez-Vicente 2007).”
- Women as Sex Objects and Victims in Print Advertisements (2008, background): “%) was nearly identical to the percentage of advertisements that Lindner (2004) reported objectified women in Time magazine (8.2%).”