Walking the talk? Supply chain accounting and trust among UK supermarkets and suppliers

By Clinton Free. 2008

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/caf23797f4e72648f05678787a7b1297683a4ed4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

How Formal Performance Evaluation Affects Trust between Superior and Subordinate Managers (2009, background): “In accounting studies, trust appears to be an important factor across organizational settings and levels of analysis, and explains the functioning of company-wide pay-for-performance systems as well as the success of inter-organizational networks (e.g., Chenhall & Langfield-Smith, 2003; Dekker, 2004”
Governmentality in Accounting and Accountability: A Case Study of Embedding Sustainability in a Supply Chain (2014, background): “This in turn, gives the supermarket the opportunity to pursue an array of self-interested intentions in the rhetoric of ‘collaboration’, ‘partnership’ and ‘business integration’ (Free, 2008).”
Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda (2017, background): “• Articles dealing with open book accounting (OBA) (e.g. Caglio and Ditillo, 2008; Free, 2008).”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Garment Sourcing Networks: Factory Management Perspectives on Ethical Trade in Sri Lanka (2015, background): “This qualitative research paper adopts a strategic perspective by accessing the situated knowledge at one nodal point of the production network: the managers of apparel production facilities in a developing country context.”
Performance measurement, modes of evaluation and the development of compromising accounts (2013, methodology): “Consistent with the approach employed by Ahrens & Chapman (2004), Free (2008), and Chenhall, Hall & Smith (2010), we employed Eisenhardt’s (1989) methods.”