The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
By T. Kuhn, David Hawkins. 1963
Subfields: Philosophy
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Philosophy
- Brenden M. Lake
- James L. McClelland
- Joaquín M. Fuster
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Timothy T. Rogers
- Norbert Schwarz
- T. Popkewitz
- T. Swift
Citations in the corpus
- Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond (2020, background): “A clearer articulation of text ranking is presented in Maron and Kuhns [1960], who characterized the information retrieval problem (although they didn’t use these words) as receiving requests from the user and “to provide as an output an ordered list of those documents which most probably satisfy th”
- Trend analysis of climate time series: A review of methods (2019, background): “This is a part of normal science (Kuhn, 1970), and the climate community should not expect too many big surprises.”
- The roles and effects of paradigms in accounting research (2010, background): “In short, Kuhn (1962) argued that scientific disciplines end to have periods of “normal science”, when researchers ranquilly work ‘within the box’ of the ruling paradigm. owever, it is not untypical that research findings gradally start to bring forth anomalies, which do not fit into he current…”
- Slow Response of Societies to New Problems: Causes and Costs (2003, background): “Contingency of opinion appears to be the central mechanism responsible for this pattern, which is essentially similar to the paradigm shifts described by Kuhn (1962).”
- The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Exposition (2001, background): “It was natural for those commentators to base their arguments on their own paradigms and methodological axioms, a phenomenon described in Kuhn (1962).”
- Recovering a lost baseline: missing kelp forests from a metropolitan coast (2008, background): “Such conservatism is an important hallmark of science (Kuhn 1996), but is particularly troublesome to the recovery of baselines when few long-term data sets are available for most systems.”
- Peer Argumentation in the School Science Laboratory—Exploring effects of task features (2011, background): “but as ideas shaped through critique, debate and revision within the science community (Kuhn, 1962).”
- Premises of multi-competence (2016, background): “Multi-competence is a way of looking at things from another angle rather than of exploring the implications and contradictions within the same perspective, ‘revolutionary’ rather than ‘normal’ science (Kuhn 1962).”
- Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine (2009, background): “Furthermore, while the diversity provided by sparse ego networks is important, overlapping knowledge is also important in the pursuit of “normal science” (Kuhn 1962).”
- Organizing Knowledge Processes in the Multinational Corporation: An Introduction (2004, background): “In some ways, the transition from the market failure approach of the 1970s and the 1980s to the present knowledge-based view led to a Kuhnian loss of content ( Kuhn, 1970 ).”
- Venture Creation and the Enterprising Individual: A Review and Synthesis (2003, background): “Scientific progress is made when the number of alternative explanations is reduced (Kuhn, 1962).”