The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Exposition

By E. Forman, S. Gass. Operational Research, 2001

1,166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad53cbb776ee0d9f51bba01babc2d8e7855d8546

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach (2006, background): “Keywords: Website quality; E-business success; Analytic hierarchy process”
Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process (2006, methodology): “AHP is also based on a similar homogeneity axiom [45,46].”
CLUSTERS AND PIVOTS FOR EVALUATING A LARGE NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES IN AHP (2012, neutral): “…been applied successfully on numerous occasions: see for example the reviews (Zahedi, 1986; Golden & Wasil et al., 1989; Shim, 1989; Vargas, 1990; Saaty & Forman, 1992; Forman & Gass, 2001; Kumar & Vaidya, 2006; Omkarprasad & Sushil, 2006; Ho, 2008; Liberatore & Nydick, 2008; Sipahi & Timor, 2010).”
A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP (2008, background): “Since Saaty (1977, 1980) introduced the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), many applications in real-world decision-making have been reported (cf. Zahedi, 1986; Golden et al., 1989; Shim, 1989; Vargas, 1990; Saaty, 2000; Forman and Gass, 2001; Golden and Wasil, 2003; Vaidya and Kumar, 2006).”
Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment (2008, background): “A set of weights at each level of the hierarchy are elicited from the ‘‘pairwise’’ comparison matrices in order to obtain the respective ranking of alternatives (Saaty, 1980; Forman and Gass, 2001).”
Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and limitations (2009, background): “Several papers have compiled the AHP success stories in very different fields (Zahedi, 1986; Golden et al , 1989; Shim, 1989; Vargas, 1990; Saaty and Forman, 1992; Forman and Gass, 2001; Kumar and Vaidya, 2006; Omkarprasad and Sushil, 2006; Ho, 2008; Liberatore and Nydick, 2008).”
Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis (2016, methodology): “Both the AHP and ANP methodologies have been made a subject of various books and papers (see e.g. Dyer and Forman 1992; Forman and Gass 2001; Saaty 2001b, 2009; Saaty and Vargas 2013).”
A three-stage hybrid approach for weight assignment in MADM ☆ (2017, methodology): “The first type of approaches may be named as subjective approaches, such as Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART, [26,27]) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP, [30,44,45]).”
Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP☆ (2010, methodology): “Forman and Peniwati (1998) discuss some possible paths for constructing the comparison matrices, that is, for aggregating individual responses in terms of a group response. Two of these paths are (i) simple averaging across the assessments (of the values of priorities and of the performance level of”
Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature (2015, positive): “It is used by decision makers and researchers, because it is a simple and powerful tool [3].”
Ecology and management of alien plant invasions in South African fynbos: Accommodating key complexities in objective decision making (2009, methodology): “The process was done using the synthesis ideal mode, which control for changes in rank orders among the existing alternatives objected of the prioritization process (Forman and Gass, 2001).”