The roles and effects of paradigms in accounting research

By K. Lukka. 2010

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems (2012, background): “Lukka (2010), for instance, criticised recent trends in what he termed ‘mainstream accounting research’ as most papers make only very marginal contributions to knowledge.”
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and Investment Decision in Bangladesh (2018, methodology): “Therefore, the present study used the positivist paradigm, as this mode of accounting research seeks to uncover law-like regularities that are testable by empirical datasets [80].”
The research design maze: understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies (2012, background): “72 The importance of and the debate over research paradigms has been recorded in the accounting literature (see, for instance, Laughlin 1995; Ahrens 2008; KakkuriKnuuttila, Lukka and Kuorikoski 2008; Kaidonis, Moerman and Rudkin 2009; Lukka 2010).”
Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis – Towards a new paradigm (2014, unknown): “And, while Kuhn states that the new paradigm replaces the old one, dozens of scientists from different disciplines have more recently argued that some disciplines are ‘‘multi-paradigmatic’’ (e.g. Lukka, 2010) and that the diversity of world views is the key to interpretation and understanding of it.”