Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers: The Effect of Recruitment Method in Dictator Experiments
By Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman. 2000
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cab8b952340b7c6949bdd85209ddb82c43d67472
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Daniele Nosenzo
- René Bekkers
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Christoph Engel
- Aldo Rustichini
- John H. Kagel
- Vernon L. Smith
- David J. Cooper
In General Decision Sciences
- Aldo Rustichini
- Stephen V. Burks
- Christoph Engel
- David J. Cooper
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- Daniele Nosenzo
- John H. Kagel
- Ruth Potter
In Safety Research
- Daniele Nosenzo
- Pamala Wiepking
- Jeffrey P. Carpenter
- René Bekkers
- Christoph Engel
- Stephen V. Burks
- Aldo Rustichini
- Ben Greiner
Citations in the corpus
- The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 - A Guide for the Organization of Experiments in Economics (2004, background): “Eckel & Grossman (2000) tested for dierences in behavior between volunteers (who turn up at a particular time and location, motivated by promises of financial reward) and pseudo-volunteers (recruited from a class in which the experiment was to be conducted immediately, but where students could leav”
- Method in Experiment: Rhetoric and Reality (2002, background): “Dictator game results are also influenced by whether you recruit the subjects (volunteers) to the lab for an experiment, or use the students in your class during class ( Eckel and Grossman, 2000 ).”
- Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments (2010, unknown): “19 Eckel and Grossman (2000) present a dictator game experiment where (a) pseudo-volunteers give more”
- Rebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter? (2003, unknown): “6 See Eckel and Grossman ( 2000 ) for a discussion of differences in the behavior of subjects by subject pool . form , a description of services provided by the various charities , and a blank 7 envelope .”
- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “Eckel and Grossman (2000) find that participants in a dictator game experiment who are recruited through flyers telling they could earn money are less generous and less strongly motivated by nonmonetary factors than participants recruited in class.”
- Other Regarding Preferences: A Selective Survey of Experimental Results (2012, methodology): “CS report that students 63 Eckel and Grossman (2000) pioneered this technique using a dictator game.”
- Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples (2013, methodology): “…of running an experiment with trainee truckers as a method to gather data on a relatively non-self-selected sample is similar to the use of classroom experiments with college students by related studies that address the selection issue (e.g., Cleave et al.(2011) or Eckel and Grossman (2000)).”
- Dictator games: a meta study (2011, background): “…Grossman 1998; Eichenberger and Oberholzer-Gee 1998; Ruffle 1998; Selten and Ockenfels 1998; Bohnet and Frey 1999; Anderson, Rodgeres et al. 2000; Eckel and Grossman 2000; Harbaugh and Krause 2000; Johanneson and Persson 2000; Andreoni and Vesterlund 2001; Cherry 2001; Fershtman and Gneezy 2001;…”