Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples
By Jon E. Anderson, Stephen V. Burks, Jeffrey P. Carpenter, L. Götte, Karsten Maurer, Daniele Nosenzo, Ruth Potter, Kim Rocha, Aldo Rustichini. 2013
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bb64ecc0cbe19dc7cc23f5afcbc925b28e1d231
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
In General Decision Sciences
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games (2015, background): “But the differences could also compromise the generalizability of the results if they directly affect their ability to reason strategically or are correlated with risk or other-regarding preferences (Anderson et al., 2013).”
- Conducting interactive experiments online (2017, unknown): “Interestingly though, results from Anderson et al. (2013) show that a comparable type of selection is unlikely to bias inference about the prevalence of other-regarding preferences.”
- Discrimination in the laboratory: A meta-analysis of economics experiments (2016, background): “This suggests – unlike in the context of social preferences (e.g. Bellemare and Kroger, 2007; Anderson et al, 2013) – student subjects are not a generally unrepresentative sample for questions relating to discrimination.”