Corporate social responsibility, partnerships, and institutional change: The case of mining companies in South Africa

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Community development agreements in the mining industry: an emerging global phenomenon (2013, background): “The reality of these threats has been highlighted again and again and across the globe in recent decades (Hamann, 2004; Haselip, 2011; Hilson & Yakavlova, 2007; Laplante & Spears, 2008).”
Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Perspectives from stakeholder groups in Argentina (2012, background): “There are continuous attempts to weave sustainability and social responsibility in business strategies and as a consequence, CSR is broadly perceived as a tool for companies to contribute towards sustainable development (Hilson and Murck, 2000; Hamann, 2003; Hamann, 2004).”
Corporate social responsibility and developing countries (2011, background): “Hamann (2007) attribute this problem to the complexity of CSR and development relationship, methodological diffi culties and issues of political economy.”
Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis (2013, background): “’ Consistent with these arguments, the lack of substantive CSR activities by profitable South African firms led the government to mandate a corporate social investment program requiring firms to give a small proportion of their profits to CSR and to report their corporate social investment expenditu”