Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No☆

By S. Chuah, Fritz Drasgow, B. Roberts. 2006

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8ba61759e273cc62b0582c0e8fbfaf2dabb5838

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Benjamin E. Hilbig
2. Ingo Zettler
3. Jacob B Hirsh
4. Niklas Friedrich
5. Jordan B. Peterson
6. Colin G. DeYoung
7. Tal Yarkoni
8. Timo Heydasch

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Benjamin E. Hilbig
2. Ingo Zettler
3. Niklas Friedrich
4. Jordan B. Peterson
5. Jacob B Hirsh
6. E. Koopman
7. Timo Heydasch
8. Raymond A. Mar

Citations in the corpus

• Predicting creativity and academic success with a “Fake-Proof” measure of the Big Five (2008, background): “Previous research suggests equivalence between online and paper administration of personality questionnaires ( Chuah, Drasgow, & Roberts, 2006 ).”
• Dissecting work commitment: the role of Machiavellianism (2011, methodology): “Web studies have proven both useful and unproblematic for the investigation of personality-related research questions ( Chuah et al. , 2006”