Intellectual capital: disentangling an enigmatic concept

By Juani Swart. 2006

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Communication, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c81cab03242f0a9e939186920a7d9cc85c2a62ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Feng Liu
2. Jian Xu
3. Weizheng Yu
4. Yue Shang
5. J. C. Miller
6. Barbara Čater
7. Liz Lee-Kelley
8. Vinod Kumar

In Communication

1. Vinod Kumar
2. Dong-Young Kim
3. J. C. Miller
4. Barbara Čater
5. Liz Lee-Kelley
6. Feng Liu
7. Nick Bontis
8. N. Turner

In Strategy and Management

1. R. Whiting
2. Feng Liu
3. Vinod Kumar
4. Dong-Young Kim
5. Gerhard Kristandl
6. Jian Xu
7. Weizheng Yu
8. Yue Shang

Citations in the corpus

• (In)tangible resources as antecedents of a company's competitive advantage and performance* (2009, background): “Based on these definitions it is evident that human capital is an individual-level construct (Swart 2006).”
• Organization Capital and Sticky Behaviour of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (2015, background): “A firm’s relationship with ts environment can be analysed on two levels: The first efers to the firm’s relations with customers, suppliers, artners and competitors; and the second refers to its relaions with society in general (Swart, 2006).”
• Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda (2013, unknown): “This allows the identification of the unique and valuable knowledge at both individual and collective levels within an organization that enables the production of goods or services (Swart, 2006).”
• The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Firm Performance: A Modified and Extended VAIC Model (2020, background): “Knowledge generated by the cooperation of employees or divisions is also included in the definition of HC (Swart, 2006).”
• Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics (2013, background): “They argue that organisational knowledge may be broken into subcomponents of human capital (HC), social capital (SC) and organisational capital (OC) (see also Swart, 2006).”
• Voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital in New Zealand annual reports and the “hidden value” (2008, background): “There is no clearly defined or accepted definition of intellectual capital (Zambon, 2004; Swart, 2006) and the terms intellectual capital, intangibles, and knowledge assets are often used interchangeably (Lev, 2001).”
• Intellectual Capital, Technological Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector (2019, background): “HC also includes the competence and knowledge that the cooperation of employees or divisions has brought up [31].”
• Constructing a definition for intangibles using the resource based view of the firm (2007, background): “Limitations Swart (2006) argues that theoretical frameworks such as human capital theory or RBV have added to the understanding of the sub-components of intangibles, however, such frameworks do not clearly state what it is and how it contributes to corporate performance.”
• A FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZATION OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL INDICATORS IN R&D (2009, background): “In this paper, human capital is addressed as an individual’s knowledge, skills, know-how, and experience (Swart, 2006; Bontis, 1999).”