Behavioral Outcomes of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy and Triple P—Positive Parenting Program: A Review and Meta-Analysis

By Rae Thomas, M. Zimmer‐Gembeck. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2007

702 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7706a5095f2e451a7f617ee3221443cb33db1e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Impacts of adverse childhood experiences on health, mental health, and substance use in early adulthood: a cohort study of an urban, minority sample in the U.S. (2013, background): “…Therapy (PCIT) and the Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) also appear to reduce rates of maltreatment while enhancing parenting attitudes, parent–child interactions, and child mental health (Chaffin et al., 2004; Prinz, Sanders, Shapiro, Whitaker, & Lutzker, 2009; Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007).”
A Meta-analytic Review of Components Associated with Parent Training Program Effectiveness (2008, background): “Not surprisingly, a number of meta-analyses have been published on parent training programs, including studies focusing exclusively on the effects of one or two specific programs (e.g., Cedar and Levant 1990; Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck 2007), the effects associated with a specific delivery setting (e”
Promoting Optimal Parenting and Children’s Mental Health: A Preliminary Evaluation of the How-to Parenting Program (2014, background): “Most evaluated parenting programs typically target children who are already showing psychological problems (mostly externalizing; Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck 2007).”
Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (2012, background): “…and mediumto-large effect sizes in reductions in child externalizing behavior and parental stress, increases in positive observations of parent behavior (see Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007 for a review), and more recently, increases in maternal sensitivity (Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2011).”
The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. (2014, background): “…have evaluated Triple P reporting medium to large effect sizes on child and parent outcomes (de Graaf, Speetjens, Smit, de Wolff, & Tavecchio, 2008a, 2008b; Fletcher, Freeman, & Matthey, 2011; Nowak & Heinrichs, 2008; Tellegen & Sanders, 2013; Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007; Wilson et al., 2012).”
Effectiveness of Parent—Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Among Chinese Families (2009, background): “The effect sizes of 0.97 to 1.59 compare well with those reported in a metaanalysis with effect size on child behavior (Thomas & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007).”
Parent–Child Interaction Therapy for Child Disruptive Behaviour Disorders: A Meta-analysis (2016, unknown): “2 Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck (2007) meta-analysis included studies dated up to 2004.”
The Move to Evidence-Based Practice: How Well Does it Fit Child Welfare Services? (2008, methodology): “A recent meta-analysis of PCIT also confirms that the effects of the full program are robust across child problems and parenting problems, according to parental self-report ( Thomas, & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007 ).”
A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling: Effectiveness and Moderating Variables (2008, methodology): “This concurred with the metaanalytical results reported by Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck (2007) who employed a fixed-effects approach and found effect sizes for parenting and child behavior to range between 0.38–0.70 and 0.31–0.73, respectively.”