Intentionality, Morality, and Their Relationship in Human Judgment

By Bertram F. Malle. 2006

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5cc96d3548dd8e2b842dd939f8d77b810229c9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Including Deontic Reasoning as Fundamental to Theory of Mind (2008, background): “Indeed, in an emerging number of studies, adults tend to regard morally bad (foreseen) side effects as intentional but morally good (foreseen) side effects as unintentional [Knobe, 2003, 2004; Knobe & Burra, 2000; Knobe & Mendlow, in press; Malle, 2006; Nadelhoffer, in press].”
The Epistemic Side-Effect Effect (2010, methodology): “Malle (2006) also performed an archival study using the LEXIS-NEXIS database and found that 88% of the time the term ‘intentional’ was used, it was used to refer to a negative action and 99% of the time ‘intentionally’ was used to refer to a negative action.”
Time to Give Up the Dogmas of Attribution (2011, methodology): “…the entire realm of behavior into intentional and unintentional events, guides perceptual and cognitive processes (such as inference and explanation), and influences judgments of praise, blame, and moral responsibility (Cushman, 2008; Guglielmo, Monroe, &Malle, 2009; Malle, 2006a; Shaver, 1985).”
The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology (2006, background): “and psychologists (Feltz & Cokely 2007; Leslie et al. 2006; Malle 2006; McCann 2005;”
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy (2018, result): “For the year 2006, Malle (2006) was replaced with Nichols (2006), given that the original paper misreported both the results and statistical analyses, making comparison with replication impossible.”
The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment (2009, background): “Hence, most researchers have concluded that people’s moral judgments are somehow influencing their intuitions as to whether or not an agent acts intentionally (Knobe 2006; Malle 2006; Nadelhoffer 2006; Nado 2008).”