The Epistemic Side-Effect Effect

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Belief Through Thick and Thin (2015, background): “In response, Rose & Schaffer argue that this fnding is an instance of a larger phenomenon in experimental philosophy known as the epistemic side-effect effect (see Beebe & Buckwalter 2010) whereby moral considerations can infuence ascriptions of knowledge and belief (see Beebe forthcoming).”
Gender and Philosophical Intuition (2010, background): “Intrigued by some of the findings we have been recounting, Buckwalter decided to reanalyze the data he and James Beebe had collected, which had demonstrated a surprising extension of the side-effect effect discovered by Joshua Knobe (Beebe and Buckwalter 2010). While Knobe’s original studies focus o”
Telling More Than We Can Know About Intentional Action (2011, background): “…current model is discussed and tested in Section 1.4), the Good/Bad Model has been influential in the literature in recent years and continues to be explicitly endorsed (e.g. Beebe and Buckwalter, 2010), or implicitly assumed by a number of writers, and thus warrants continued scrutiny and testing.”
Contrastive Knowledge Surveyed (2012, background): “And so Beebe and Buckwalter (2010) conducted a study looking for moral valence effects on knowledge ascriptions.”