The Effect of Computers on Student Writing: A Meta-analysis of Studies from 1992 to 2002
By Amie L. Goldberg, M. Russell, A. Cook. 2003
466 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5b5d8911d7870c40142f325c79d0e5301a84057
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Steve Graham
- Rui Alexandre Alves
- K. Harris
- T. Santangelo
- Teresa Limpo
- Sharlene A. Kiuhara
- D. McKeown
- Paul Morphy
Citations in the corpus
- Cognitive processes in writing during pause and execution periods (2009, background): “Furthermore, Goldberg, Russell, and Cook ( 2003 ) confirmed that when composing with keyboard revision occurs more frequently, but mainly to edit the text at local level (see also, Kellogg & Mueller, 1993 ).”
- Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: a meta-analysis of research findings (2012, methodology): “A subsequent meta-analysis by Goldberg et al. (2003) , with a new set of studies conducted and published in the 10 years following Bangert-Drowns (1993), produced similar findings.”
- A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Students in the Elementary Grades. (2012, methodology): “This metaanalysis and previous ones (e.g., Bangert-Drowns, 1993; Goldberg et al., 2003; Graham & Perin, 2007a, 2007c; Hillocks, 1986) indicate otherwise, as a variety of effective tools for improving the overall quality of students’ writing were identified.”
- Computer- vs. paper-based tasks: Are they equivalent? (2008, background): “Goldberg et al. (2003) in a meta-analysis of studies comparing computers and paper over a 10-year period found significant effect sizes, which favoured computers in both quantity and quality of writing.”
- A meta-analysis of single subject design writing intervention research. (2008, background): “…have examined true- and quasiexperimental writing intervention studies to identify such practices (Bangert-Drowns, 1993; Bangert-Drowns et al., 2004; Goldring et al., 2003; Graham, 2006a; Graham & Harris, 2003; Graham & Olinghouse, in press; Graham & Perin, 2007a, 2007b; Hillocks, 1986).”
- Research-Based Writing Practices and the Common Core (2015, background): “Based on 30 true and quasi-experiments with students in grades 1 to 8 (from Bangert-Drowns, 1993; Goldberg et al., 2003; Graham, McKeown, et al., 2012; Graham & Perin, 2007a). available studies, word processing resulted in a positive effect.”