Meta-analysis: recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews.

By R. Rosenthal, M. Dimatteo. Annual Review of Psychology, 2001

1,794 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c541baba16dcb8ab087d496e7df5ed8d2bcfa4c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Gender Differences in Emotion Expression in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review (2012, methodology): “Therefore, we conducted random effects models, as they assume that effect sizes differ from the population by sampling error plus random variability among the studies (Field, 2003; Hedges & Vevea, 1998; Hunter & Schmidt, 1990; Lipsey & Wilson, 2001; Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001).”
Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques (2006, methodology): “(1) In cases where the authors provided only p values, we converted these to their associated z score and used Equation 2 (from Rosenthal & Dimatteo, 2001), (2) in which Z is the standard normal deviate for the associated p value and N is the sample size.”
College Diversity Experiences and Cognitive Development: A Meta-Analysis (2010, background): “Several scholars have noted that regression coefficients can be used as effect size metrics (e.g., Becker & Wu, 2007; Farley, Lehmann, & Sawyer, 1995; Raju, Fralicx, & Steinhaus, 1986; Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001).”
Understanding Meta-Analysis: A Review of the Methodological Literature (2008, methodology): “The use of a rigorous approach encourages the researcher to become intimate with the data, create focused research hypotheses, and identify moderator variables (Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001).”
A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Prediction Performance in Software Engineering (2012, neutral): “in other disciplines [14].”
Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-Analysis of Mortality Salience Research (2010, background): “Third, we examine potential moderator variables, both between- and withinstudy factors that may be associated with variations in the outcome of MS experiments (Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001).”
Expertise Differences in the Comprehension of Visualizations: a Meta-Analysis of Eye-Tracking Research in Professional Domains (2011, methodology): “First, the difference between experts and novices, experts and intermediates, and intermediates and novices was quantified and converted to the effect size index rpb (Rosenthal and DiMatteo 2001).”
Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: a meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework's theoretical suppositions. (2011, background): “Rosenthal and DiMatteo (2001), however, suggest that meta-analyses are especially fruitful in these contexts because they enhance the results’ generalizability.”
Social Media Marketing Activities and Brand Loyalty: A Meta-Analysis Examination (2021, result): “A meta-analytic approach is advantageous in the many fields in which multiple studies have yielded inconclusive or conflicting results (Gooding & John, 1985; Hedges, 1987; Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001; Schmidt, 2017).”
Organizational Support and Citizenship Behaviors: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis (2015, background): “While the advantages of meta-analysis are well known (Rosenthal and DiMatteo 2001), of particular importance when testing moderators is its ability to detect (otherwise unaccounted for) variation among subgroups.”
The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis (2015, methodology): “This procedure produces a conservative estimate of effect size (Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001).”
Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges (2010, methodology): “Meta-analysis is a statistical method that can appear complex and intimidating at first glance (Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001).”
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. (2009, background): “This form of sampling can lead to biased estimates due to selective publication (Rosenthal & DiMatteo, 2001).”