Gender Differences in Emotion Expression in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review

By T. Chaplin, A. Aldao. Psychological bulletin, 2012

1,166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Emotion expression is an important feature of healthy child development that has been found to show gender differences. However, there has been no empirical review of the literature on gender and facial, vocal, and behavioral expressions of different types of emotions in children. The present study constitutes a comprehensive meta-analytic review of gender differences, and moderators of differences, in emotion expression from infancy through adolescence. We analyzed 555 effect sizes from 166 studies with a total of 21,709 participants. Significant, but very small, gender differences were found overall, with girls showing more positive emotions (g = −.08) and internalizing emotions (e.g., sadness, anxiety, sympathy; g = −.10) than boys, and boys showing more externalizing emotions (e.g., anger; g = .09) than girls. Notably, gender differences were moderated by age, interpersonal context, and task valence, underscoring the importance of contextual factors in gender differences. Gender differences in positive emotions were more pronounced with increasing age, with girls showing more positive emotions than boys in middle childhood (g = −.20) and adolescence (g = −.28). Boys showed more externalizing emotions than girls at toddler/preschool age (g = .17) and middle childhood (g = .13) and fewer externalizing emotions than girls in adolescence (g = −.27). Gender differences were less pronounced with parents and were more pronounced with unfamiliar adults (for positive emotions) and with peers/when alone (for externalizing emotions). Our findings of gender differences in emotion expression in specific contexts have important implications for gender differences in children’s healthy and maladaptive development.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b111f0670ac918359276c00216b9c10cc32bd109

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Saif M. Mohammad
  2. Marco Iacoboni
  3. Alexandra Iwanski
  4. P. Zimmermann

In Education

  1. Alexandra Iwanski
  2. P. Zimmermann

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Marco Iacoboni
  2. Will E. Hipson
  3. Saif M. Mohammad
  4. Alexandra Iwanski
  5. P. Zimmermann
  6. Cecilia Heyes
  7. Martin Brüne
  8. Elliot C. Brown

Citations in the corpus