Understanding Meta-Analysis: A Review of the Methodological Literature

By Lori B. Shelby, Jerry J. Vaske. 2008

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fbdb4336ec8a2b22d7e9e71906be1f8b93dd425

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Wondimagegn Mengist
2. G. Legese
3. T. Soromessa
4. Lori B. Shelby
5. Jerry J. Vaske

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Wondimagegn Mengist
2. G. Legese
3. T. Soromessa
4. Jerry J. Vaske
5. Lori B. Shelby

In Statistics and Probability

1. Lori B. Shelby
2. Wondimagegn Mengist
3. G. Legese
4. T. Soromessa
5. Jerry J. Vaske
6. Mark D. Needham

Citations in the corpus

• Crowding as a Descriptive Indicator and an Evaluative Standard: Results from 30 Years of Research (2008, methodology): “Given the larger sample, researchers should consider other alternatives such as meta-analysis for comparing multiple data sets ( Lipsey & Wilson, 2001 ; Shelby & Vaske, 2008 ).”
• Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research (2019, methodology): “However, according to Shelby and Vaske [21] analysis and result reporting depends on personal judgements of the analyst, researchers understanding level of the research and study purpose.”
• The Effect of School Principals' Leadership Styles on Teachers' Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction. (2013, background): “Researchers state that there are six processing steps of meta-analysis (DeCoster, 2004; Shelby & Vaske, 2008, p. 99).”