Future directions for behavioral information security research

692 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding Employee Responses to Stressful Information Security Requirements: A Coping Perspective (2014, background): “Organizations are often reluctant to disclose this information to researchers [18]; furthermore, many ISP violations are not readily observable or objectively measurable [27].”
The Impact of Organizational Commitment on Insiders’ Motivation to Protect Organizational Information Assets (2015, methodology): “PMT has been used as the foundation for numerous previous efforts in information security [20, 40, 45, 53, 54, 102, 115].”
What Do Systems Users Have to Fear? Using Fear Appeals to Engender Threats and Fear that Motivate Protective Security Behaviors (2015, background): “We argue that actual behaviors are useful for ISec research because the goal is to change security behaviors, not just to increase protection motivation (Crossler et al. 2013).”
Information security policy compliance model in organizations (2016, neutral): “Amendment and improvement of employees’ information security behaviour, in line with information security organizational policies and procedures (ISOP), are an effective and efficient approach (Crossler et al., 2013; Son, 2011).”