Hi-LAB: A New Measure of Aptitude for High-Level Language Proficiency

By Jared Linck, Meredith M. Hughes, Susan G. Campbell, Noah H. Silbert, Medha Tare, Scott R. Jackson, Benjamin K. Smith, Michael F. Bunting, C. Doughty. 2013

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c44d45d28faffbe30d15238bee2c823767617149

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. E. Kang
2. P. Skehan
3. A. Biedroń
4. Z. Wen
5. ZhaoHong Han
6. Hossein Nassaji
7. R. Lyster
8. N. Storch

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Z. Wen
2. E. Kang
3. P. Skehan
4. A. Biedroń
5. ZhaoHong Han
6. Andrea Révész
7. R. Lyster
8. Peter Robinson

Citations in the corpus

• Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2016, methodology): “…that the components of aptitude suitable for high-level learning may be different from those at lower levels, defining high-level aptitude ‘as a composite of domain-general cognitive abilities and specific perceptual abilities’ (Linck et al. 2013: 535) that are relevant to high-level achievement.”
• The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta‐Analysis (2015, background): “Future research should not only pursue this line of inquiry further but also examine the interaction between different feedback strategies and other variables, including, but not limited to, learners’ proficiency and their predilection for explicit and implicit learning (Linck et al., 2013).”