The Performance Implications of Timing of Entry and Involvement in Multipartner Alliances

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Organizing coopetition for innovation: The case of wireless telecommunication sector in Europe (2014, background): “In this form of coopetition, where warranting proportionate distribution of benefits to partners (Lavie et al., 2007), the formal governance mechanisms prevail over informal ones in governing the relationship between competitors.”
Understanding network formation in strategy research: Exponential random graph models (2016, background): “For example, ERGMs allow for the study of multipartner alliances that involve three or more actors (Das and Teng, 2002; Lavie, Lechner, and Singh, 2007; Li et al., 2012).”
Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation (2014, background): “The timing in which an alliance is formed is highly consequential to the partners, given that it typically can affect the distribution of future revenues between them and the relative ability of each partner to affect the alliance’s evolution and progress (Lavie, Lechner, and Singh, 2007).”