Spelling-Sound Consistency and Regularity Effects in Word Naming

By Debra Jared. 2002

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c351f1113d159055d25b31d3a2bff273c50342ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. (2007, methodology): “In this section, we examine the effect of consistency in three different ways: First, we examine the effect of consistency on word naming latencies (Jared, 2002), and then we investigate the consistency effect on nonword naming (Andrews & Scarratt, 1998).”
Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming (2002, background): “Research has shown that high-frequency within-language enemies reliably slow naming when a word has low-frequency friends (Jared, McRae and Seidenberg, 1990; Jared, 1997, 2002; Jared and Kroll, 2001).”
Simulating consistency effects and individual differences in nonword naming: A comparison of current models (2006, background): “For example both Cortese and Simpson (2000) and Jared (2002) conducted naming studies that explicitly compared the regularity and consistency factors, and examined the performance of the Plaut et al. (1996) and Coltheart et al. (2001) models on their stimuli.”
Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words (2009, background): “Subsequent work pitting regularity against consistency (e.g., Cortese & Simpson, 2000; Jared, 2002) suggests that consistency, compared to regularity, better captures the mapping between spelling and sound.”
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. (2010, unknown): “This list includes the effects of word frequency (e.g., Weekes, 1997), spelling–sound consistency (e.g., Jared, 2002), and word length (e.g., Ziegler, Perry, Jacobs, & Braun, 2001), as well as various interactions between these factors.”