Good Science, Bad Science: Teaching Evolution in the States

By L. S. Lerner. 2000

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2ff64e4c315684d2e455dbb2c1c2c5158fa2d49

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Ross H. Nehm
2. S. Kim
3. I. Schonfeld
4. Minsu Ha
5. I. Neumann

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open‐response instrument, and an oral interview (2008, background): “Likewise, evolution and natural selection serve as unifying concepts that provide curricular coherence for the life science strands of the National Science Education Standards as well as many state standards (Donnelly & Boone, 2007; Lerner, 2000; NRC, 1996; Skoog & Bilica, 2002).”
• A Cross‐Cultural Comparison of Korean and American Science Teachers’ Views of Evolution and the Nature of Science (2011, background): “Moreover, many state science standards remain weak with regard to the importance of evolutionary theory to the natural sciences (Lerner, 2000; Moore, 2003).”