Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science: Epistemic Cognition, Motivated Reasoning, and Conceptual Change
By Gale M. Sinatra, Dorothe Kienhues, B. Hofer. 2014
348 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1be8923c711838863bf03ebf15a78c2280ab24f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Gale M. Sinatra
- Doug Lombardi
- Krista R. Muis
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Gregory Trevors
- Sheila T. Murphy
- Philip H. Winne
- Nathan Walter
In Education
- Gale M. Sinatra
- Doug Lombardi
- Krista R. Muis
- Gregory Trevors
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Philip H. Winne
- Jeffrey Alan Greene
- Suzanne H. Broughton
Citations in the corpus
- How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation (2018, background): “For example, evolution acceptance rates and climate change acceptance rates are found to be dramatically different across countries and regions (Sinatra, Kienhues, & Hofer, 2014).”
- Identity and Epistemic Emotions During Knowledge Revision: A Potential Account for the Backfire Effect (2016, background): “As one aspect of cognitive bias, Sinatra et al. (2014) argue that motivated reasoning is a factor underlying why some misconceptions are generated and resistant to change.”
- Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments (2020, background): “Specific cognitive biases that tend to impede evaluation of scientific information have been discussed elsewhere (Sinatra et al., 2014).”