Interactive Effects of Mood and Task Framing on Creative Generation

By R. Friedman, Jens Förster, M. Denzler. 2007

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1a12f6c4e6e2a77a89e972b7640c3bc476a8af2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
2. Erin R. Fluegge-Woolf
3. Reinhard Pekrun

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
2. Reinhard Pekrun
3. Erin R. Fluegge-Woolf
4. Thomas Goetz
5. Nathan C. Hall
6. A. Frenzel
7. Chengchen Li
8. Kou Murayama

In Social Psychology

1. Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia
2. Reinhard Pekrun
3. Erin R. Fluegge-Woolf
4. Thomas Goetz
5. Nathan C. Hall
6. Kou Murayama
7. A. Frenzel
8. Chengchen Li

Citations in the corpus

• Play hard, work hard: Fun at work and job performance (2014, background): “However, with one exception (Friedman et al., 2007), research on the relationship between fun at work and creativity is essentially non-existent.”
• International handbook of emotions in education. (2014, background): “Based on these theoretical assumptions, Friedman, Förster, and Denzler (2007) analyzed the performance in a creative generation task that was either framed as silly and fun or as serious and important, thus making the task motivationally compatible with positive or negative mood, respectively.”