Investigating Instruction for Improving Revision of Argumentative Essays

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essays (2016, methodology): “Novel methods have broad application potential in various areas such as legal decision support (Mochales-Palau and Moens 2009), information retrieval (Carstens and Toni 2015), policy making (Sardianos et al. 2015), and debating technologies (Levy et al. 2014; Rinott et al. 2015).”
Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (2016, background): “…teaching students to organize the structure and order of presenting arguments, as well as including both pro and contra arguments in their essays (Butler & Britt, 2011); training students to use outlines (Erkens, Jaspers, Prangsma, & Kanselaar, 2005), graphic visualizations (Lu & Zhang, 2013;…”
Students' use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan (2012, background): “In spite of many studies on writing strategies, both the theoretical and empirical aspects (e.g., Butler & Britt, 2011; Cohen & Macaro, 2007; Cumming, 1989; Manchon, Roca de Larios, & Murphy, 2007; Raimes, 1987; Roca de Larios, Marin, & Murphy, 2001; Roca de Larios, Murphy, & Manchon, 1999; van…”
Annotating Argument Components and Relations in Persuasive Essays (2014, result): “This assumption is supported by recent ﬁndings in psychology, which conﬁrm that even general tutorials effectively improve the quality of written arguments (Butler and Britt, 2011).”